copyclaim, who’s gonna listen to you?
Other May 17th, 2007
Copyclaim.com let’s users generate timestamp hash values for files on their computers without having to make an account.
Why it is sucky:
No courts are going to go along with this if you’re planning to use it for copyright protection.
It embeds a Java applet which crashed my browser several times. Java? That’s so 10 years ago…
Why don’t we just use the same fingerprint hash values we have been using- like MD5?
Impractical idea, unattractive layout, worthy of 1 star.
Rating: 
Related Posts:
May 19th, 2007 at 4:06 pm
So, who are you to judge? Your fabulous website doesn’t show me any “about”-infos at all. (the kind of mistake that might still be in the top 10 of the worst ones)
You dont like the website’s idea, because you just don’t understand the very simple concept it is based upon.
Contrary to your rethorical question, it is the well-known MD5 algorithm, digital timestamps are based upon here. Then again, timestamps are a common way to prove the existence of a file at a certain time. You go somewhere else and you might probably pay for that kind of service.
> No courts are going to go along with this if you
May 21st, 2007 at 2:47 pm
Thanks for not allowing opinions next to yours!
Of course its just your own private page, so I won’t care anymore. Sad anyway…
May 21st, 2007 at 3:10 pm
I’m sorry, your comment got filtered as spam by Asikmet. I don’t block any comments posted. As you can see from previous posts, there are others who also disagree with me.
>So, who are you to judge? Your fabulous website doesn
June 21st, 2007 at 6:36 am
Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! rtwvlddwncllvw
January 25th, 2010 at 10:01 am
I believe the service offered at copyclaim is excellent; hash code, date, time stamping should become a standard;
this is a simple cost effective solution to multiple files.
This will of course displease such juggernauts as the US Copyright office, whose fees preclude many artists from intellectual property protection.